Ward's Pill and Drop
- Ward's pill and drop, a single proprietary product line, can cure any human ailment a patient may have. refuted
- Ward held that dropsy stood first among the diseases over which his medicine was always certain of triumphing; his patient Henry Fielding recorded that the medicine had seldom any perceptible operation on his own case of the disease. refuted
- Advertising for the medicine sold under Ward's name claims the White Drop does 'great service' against King's Evil (scrofula), leprosy, and St Anthony's Fire, is 'a great antivenereal,' and that companion remedies relieve gout, rheumatism, fevers, and coughs. untested
- Ward, Joshua (1685-1761) (1899)
- The Drop and Pill of Mr. Ward, Consider'd ... In an Epistle to J. Jurin (1735)
- A True and Candid Relation of the Good and Bad Effects of Joshua Ward's Pill and Drop. Exhibited in Sixty-Eight Cases (1736)
- The Journal of a Voyage to Lisbon (1755)
- Observations on the Present State, of the Late Dr. Ward's Medicines: To Which Is Added an Account (from Experience) of Their Real Virtues and Efficacy (1775)
Ward’s Pill and Drop was a proprietary antimony-based medicine line, sold under Joshua Ward’s own name from a base first in France and then, from 1734, in London, advertised as effective against any disease a patient might have. Surviving advertising copy for the branded medicine (reprinted in an 1775 tract on “the late Dr. Ward’s Medicines”) specifically claims “great service” against King’s Evil (scrofula), leprosy, St Anthony’s Fire (erysipelas), gout, and rheumatism, together with an “antivenereal” effect and relief from fevers, coughs, and children’s worms. Henry Fielding’s own account records that Ward considered dropsy the disease over which “he is always certain of triumphing.” The 1899 Dictionary of National Biography records that Ward’s pills came in three colors — blue, red, and purple — all containing antimony, with two of the three also containing arsenic. No source in this bundle documents a licensing body or controlled trial certifying the medicine’s composition or effect; the chemist he engaged to compound it, J. White, held working knowledge of it (per an 1775 pamphlet White’s son later published defending its authenticity). Parliament specifically carved Ward out of the one such regulatory attempt documented here, the 1748 apothecaries bill aimed at unlicensed medicine compounders.