Christian Science treatment (prayer-based spiritual healing)
- As reproduced on the church's official Chapter XII page (observed 2026), Eddy's text states that disease is a false belief of "mortal mind, alias matter," with no reality of its own; rising in the conscious strength of the spirit of Truth to overthrow that belief, against the supremacy of Spirit, dissolves the disease along with it. unreplicated
- As reproduced on the church's official Chapter XII page (observed 2026), Eddy's text instructs that prayer alone, delivered as Christian Science treatment without medical means, meets the approaching symptoms and incipient stages of named diseases -- including cancer, consumption, and smallpox -- and restores health. unproven
- The church's own current practitioners page states that Christian Science treatment "can resolve and heal any issue." unproven
- Science and Health, with Key to the Scriptures (Project Gutenberg eBook #3458) (2002)
- Science and Health, Chapter XII: Christian Science Practice (christianscience.com) (2026)
- Mary Baker Eddy (Wikipedia) (2026)
- Christian Science practitioners (christianscience.com) (2026)
- Questions and Answers (christianscience.com press room) (2026)
- Christian Science Church seeks truce with modern medicine (2010)
Christian Science treatment is the system Mary Baker Eddy said she discovered in 1866 in Lynn, Massachusetts, and formalized in 1875 by publishing Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures (Wikipedia, “Mary Baker Eddy”). Its founding doctrine holds that disease — named explicitly, in Eddy’s own text, as including the approaching symptoms and incipient stages of cancer, consumption, and smallpox — is a false belief of “mortal mind, alias matter,” and that rising in the conscious strength of “the spirit of Truth” to overthrow that belief “against the supremacy of Spirit” dissolves the sickness along with it (Science and Health, SH 390:27-391:6). Treatment is delivered through specific prayer, either by the patient or by a paid Christian Science practitioner evaluated and listed by the church, administered without medication or medical diagnosis; the church’s current materials frame reliance on prayer alone as a personal choice rather than a mandatory substitute for medical care.
The practice remains actively marketed today. The church’s own site states that Christian Science practitioners are self-employed, don’t receive any form of payment from the church, and charge what the church calls “a reasonable fee for their services,” and frames prayer treatment as something that “has shown them that Christian Science treatment can resolve and heal any issue” (christianscience.com). This case treats the founding prayer-alone-heals-disease doctrine, its named-disease incipient-stage promise, and its direct present-day continuation (the church’s still-active, fee-charging, church-evaluated practitioner network) as the subject; it does not assess Christian Science as a religious or devotional practice apart from its marketed healing claim.