The liniment is harmless when applied to healthy skin but produces its wound-raising effect only where it overlies a diseased organ, so that its action itself distinguishes sound tissue from unsound tissue.
Long and his defenders presented the liniment’s corrosive action as diagnostic: a lotion that supposedly acted only over diseased tissue and left healthy skin unharmed. Catherine Cashin was, in the Newgate Calendar’s account, “twenty-four years of age and in the full enjoyment of health” when Long applied the liniment to her preventively; it nonetheless produced a large, severely inflamed, infected wound that killed her, refuting the claim that the preparation could tell sound tissue from unsound. No independent chemical or clinical account of any such selective action exists; the corrosive liquid used on Cashin behaved as an ordinary caustic on healthy skin.
Appears in
Sources
- John St John Long: quackery and manslaughter — Hempel, Sandra. John St John Long: quackery and manslaughter. The Lancet 383(9928): 1540-1541, 3 May 2014. PMID: 24800298. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60737-6.
- St. John Long and His Disciples — St. John Long and His Disciples. The Medico-chirurgical Review 13(26): 572-573, 1 October 1830. PMID: 29919038. PMCID: PMC5100398.
- John St John Long (The Complete Newgate Calendar, Vol. 3) — Rayner, J. L.; Crook, G. T. (eds). 'John St John Long.' The Complete Newgate Calendar, Vol. 3. London: Navarre Society, 1926. Text as transcribed at exclassics.com.