METHUSELAH ARCHIVE CLAIMS
Claim · 1925 · I-ON-A-CO

Worn around the body and connected to the household current, the I-ON-A-CO creates a magnetic field that magnetizes the iron in the body, increasing the oxygen carried to the tissue cells and purifying the blood-stream.

mechanism onlyrefuted made by Gaylord Wilshire intervention I-ON-A-CO

The mechanistic premise of the device. The I-ON-A-CO’s own advertising stated that it ‘magnetizes the iron in your body and thus increases oxygen brought to the tissue cells,’ so that ‘this oxidation purifies the blood-stream and tends to restore the Ionaco user to perfect health.’ Morris Fishbein’s 1932 Fads and Quackery in Healing records the same pitch, that a magnetic field ‘controlled all disease by magnetizing the iron in the blood.’ Classified mechanism-only: the claim describes a supposed physical mode of action rather than any measured clinical outcome. It is refuted. The iron in the blood is organically combined within the haemoglobin molecule, not free metallic iron, and is not meaningfully magnetizable; a weak induced field from a coil of wire does not increase tissue oxygenation, and there is no pathway by which it would purify the blood or restore health. The claim is the magnetic-and-oxidation analogue of the vitalist mechanisms advanced for the contemporaneous electrical devices of Otto Overbeck and Albert Abrams.

Sources

  1. Advertisement for Wilshire's I-ON-A-CO (c. 1924-1927) — Advertisement for Wilshire's Ionaco, c. 1924-1927. Wikimedia Commons, public domain (scanned from The Technological Fix). File: 'Advertisement for Wilshire's Ionaco.jpg'.
  2. Fads and Quackery in Healing (Wilshire's Ionaco, pp. 153-154) — Fishbein, Morris. Fads and Quackery in Healing: An Analysis of the Foibles of the Healing Cults, with Essays on Various Other Peculiar Notions in the Health Field. New York: Covici-Friede, 1932, pp. 153-154 (chapter 'Evolution of the Abrams Notion'). Full text via Internet Archive, item 1932FishbeinFadsAndQuackeryInHealing.