Targeted treatment of cancer with radiofrequency electromagnetic fields amplitude-modulated at tumor-specific frequencies
clinical paper · 2013
LINK
SUMMARY
A 2013 peer-reviewed review whose historical introduction quotes the Scientific American committee's 1923-1924 verdict on the Electronic Reactions of Abrams: 'the claims advanced on behalf of the electronic reactions of Abrams, and electronic practice in general, are not substantiated.' Used here only for that documented verdict, not for any modern claim.
NOTES
A 2013 review article in the Chinese Journal of Cancer on amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Its historical introduction recounts that ‘between 1923 and 1924, Scientific American magazine set up a committee to investigate Abrams’s results and concluded “the claims advanced on behalf of the electronic reactions of Abrams, and electronic practice in general, are not substantiated.”’ This source is cited here solely as a verifiable modern record of the Scientific American committee’s conclusion; the archive takes no position on the paper’s own modern subject matter. Metadata confirmed against the Crossref record (doi:10.5732/cjc.013.10177) and the PMC full text (PMC3845545); first author Zimmerman JW.