METHUSELAH ARCHIVE SOURCES / US-V-RUTHERFORD-SCOTUS-1979

United States v. Rutherford, 442 U.S. 544 (1979)

primary document · 1979
type:primary document
year:1979
citation:United States v. Rutherford, 442 U.S. 544 (1979). Opinion by Justice Thurgood Marshall. Decided 18 June 1979.
LINK
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-supreme-court/442/544.html
SUMMARY
U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act's premarketing safety-and-effectiveness approval requirement applies to drugs used by terminally ill patients exactly as it applies to any other drug, rejecting a Tenth Circuit ruling that those requirements did not sensibly apply to terminal cancer patients seeking laetrile. The FDA Commissioner had found, after formal administrative hearings (opinion issued 29 July 1977, 42 Fed. Reg. 39768, 39775-39787), that laetrile in its various forms was a new drug not generally recognized among experts as safe and effective, and that no adequate well-controlled scientific studies established its safety or effectiveness; the Supreme Court's opinion left that finding standing and reversed the lower courts' injunction permitting laetrile use by certified terminally ill patients. Amicus briefs opposing the government were filed for, among others, the McNaughton Foundation of California. Findlaw case text fetched directly; case citation and holding cross-confirmed via Justia case listing and Library of Congress U.S. Reports catalog record (loc.gov/item/usrep442544/).
NOTES

The landmark disconfirmation event: a unanimous-in-relevant-part Supreme Court ruling, on a case brought specifically over laetrile access, that left standing the FDA’s finding that laetrile lacked adequate safety/effectiveness evidence even for terminally ill patients. Also documents the McNaughton Foundation’s direct institutional involvement in defending laetrile in court.