METHUSELAH ARCHIVE SOURCES / MARLAND-ADAMS-HYDROPATHY-HOME-2009

Hydropathy at Home: The Water Cure and Domestic Healing in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain

secondary literature · 2009
type:secondary literature
year:2009
citation:Marland, Hilary, and Jane Adams. Hydropathy at Home: The Water Cure and Domestic Healing in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Britain. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 83, no. 3 (2009): 499-529. doi:10.1353/bhm.0.0251. PMID: 19801794.
LINK
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2774269/
SUMMARY
Peer-reviewed history-of-medicine article fetched directly (PMC2774269) on 2026-08-02. States Gully was notably critical of orthodox medicine, accusing conventional practitioners of subjecting patients, especially women, to useless local treatments, bleeding, cauterization, and injections based on exploitative diagnoses, yet concludes that in his Malvern practice he did not center on treating the poor or democratizing the water cure, but instead chiefly administered expensive regimes of treatment to wealthy patients. Records 1840s Malvern charges of 4-5 guineas a week plus 2 shillings 6 pence to bath attendants, and a 2-guinea initial consultation fee with Gully personally. Also records that Gully's own 1863 popular manual (A Guide to Domestic Hydrotherapeia) was framed as a response to patients wanting to continue home water treatment after leaving his personal supervision.
NOTES

Marland and Adams’s 2009 Bulletin of the History of Medicine article is the source for the specific fee structure of Gully’s Malvern practice (weekly charges, attendant fees, consultation fee) set against his own published rhetoric attacking orthodox medicine’s profit motive and his stated wish to see the water cure reach beyond the wealthy.