METHUSELAH ARCHIVE / SOURCES / DE-KLERK-MECHANISM-VITALISM-1979

Mechanism and vitalism. A history of the controversy

secondary literature · 1979
type:secondary literature
year:1979
citation:De Klerk GJM. 'Mechanism and vitalism. A history of the controversy.' Acta Biotheoretica. 1979;28(1):1-10. doi:10.1007/BF00054676.
LINK
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00054676
SUMMARY
Peer-reviewed history-of-biology survey of the mechanism-vitalism controversy by Geert Jan M. De Klerk. Used in this case as the scholarly reference for the controversy in which Hufeland's vital-force (Lebenskraft) doctrine sits, and for the trajectory by which mechanistic and physico-chemical explanation displaced vitalist accounts of life in mainstream biology. Identifiers copied from the Crossref record: DOI 10.1007/BF00054676 resolves to 'Mechanism and vitalism. A history of the controversy', G.J.M. De Klerk, Acta Biotheoretica, volume 28, issue 1, pages 1-10, 1979.
NOTES

De Klerk’s 1979 article in Acta Biotheoretica is a history of the mechanism-vitalism controversy in biology and is the peer-reviewed reference used in this case for the displacement of the vitalist framework on which Hufeland’s macrobiotics depended. The bibliographic metadata were copied from the deterministic Crossref record (DOI 10.1007/BF00054676; author family name De Klerk; container Acta Biotheoretica; volume 28, issue 1, pages 1-10; year 1979). The vital force (Lebenskraft) that Hufeland posited as the determinant of the term of life belongs to the vitalist side of this controversy; the historical resolution in mainstream biology favoured mechanistic and physico-chemical explanation, which is the basis for classifying the vital-force claim in this case as refuted (see also the Encyclopaedia Britannica ‘Vitalism’ entry, the separate source for the plain statement that vitalism lost standing as the physical and chemical nature of vital phenomena was demonstrated).